Justice Secretary Dominic Raab is set to unveil the proposals in the Commons today (Picture: REX)
Plans to change the Human Rights Act have been described as a ‘blatant unashamed power grab’ by the Government.
Dominic Raab is set to unveil the highly controversial proposals in the House of Commons today.
The Justice Secretary says the overhaul will prevent ‘abuses in the system’ by foreign criminals, who exploit human rights laws to avoid being deported.
He adds that the change will strengthen ‘typically British rights’ and add a ‘healthy dose of common sense’ to the interpretation of legislation and rulings.
But the plans have prompted backlash from campaigners, who say they are a ‘threat to how and when we can challenge those in power’.
They warn that the rights of ‘ordinary people’ could be ‘fatally weakened’ by the changes.
Meanwhile lawyers have described the overhaul as dangerous and say it is fuelled by political rhetoric rather than out of necessity.
Director at human rights group Liberty, Martha Spurrier, said: ‘This plan to reform the Human Rights Act is a blatant, unashamed power grab from a Government that wants to put themselves above the law.
The Justice Secretary says the changes will stop foreign criminals abusing the system to avoid deportation (Picture: PA)
‘They are quite literally rewriting the rules in their favour so they become untouchable.’
Accusing the Government of ‘systematically shutting down all avenues of accountability through a succession of rushed and oppressive Bills’, she added: ‘The Human Rights Act protects all of us. We lose it at our peril.
‘It is an essential law that allows us to challenge public authorities when they get it wrong and has helped secure justice on everything from the right to life to the right to free speech.’
Sacha Deshmukh, the chief executive of Amnesty International, said human rights are not ‘sweets’ ministers can ‘pick and choose from’ and the ‘aggressive’ attempt to ‘roll-back’ the laws needs to be stopped.
He added: ‘If ministers move ahead with plans to water down the Human Rights Act and override judgments with which they disagree, they risk aligning themselves with authoritarian regimes around the world.’
Law Society of England and Wales president Stephanie Boyce said: ‘People from all walks of life rely on the Human Rights Act to uphold and protect their rights.
‘Any reform of this subtle and carefully crafted legal instrument should be led by evidence – not driven by political rhetoric.
‘We trust that government’s final proposals will preserve the UK’s deserved reputation as a global leader in upholding human rights both domestically and on the international stage.’
The findings of a review of the Act are expected to be published alongside the launch of a three-month consultation asking for views on the plans, which have been named the Bill of Rights.
Writing in The Times, Raab outlined four key reforms that will be introduced by the bill.
Firstly, he said it would ‘strengthen’ free speech, by replacing ‘court-innovated’ privacy law. He added that this will allow for more ‘rambunctious’ debate.
Secondly, the bill will draw a ‘clearer demarcation’ between the separations of powers between the courts and parliament by ending the need for the UK’s courts to take into account the case law of the Strasbourg Court.
But human rights campaigners say the changes are a ‘threat to how and when we can challenge those in power’ (Picture: Reuters)
A senior MoJ source told the Guardian that the Government strongly feels that free speech and democratic debate had been chipped away ‘whether by wokery or political correctness’.
Thirdly, the new bill will end the practice of the UK’s courts altering new legislation, leaving that to ‘elected lawmakers’ in parliament.
Finally, a ‘permissions stage’ for human rights claims will be introduced. Applicants will be required to demonstrate they have suffered ‘significant disadvantage’ before claiming compensation for breaches of their human rights.
Courts will then take into account the ‘wider public interest’ and the behaviour of claimants before making any payouts.
According to the Government, it is estimated that as many as 70% of successful human rights challenges are brought by foreign national offenders who cite a right to family life in the first instance when appealing against deportation orders.
However it has so far been unable to supply figures on how many cases this involves.
Raab’s plan to rewrite the Act is the latest attempt by Tory ministers to tackle the legislation, which enshrined the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into domestic law.
The Government said it still intends to adhere to the ECHR, with Raab telling MPs last month there was a ‘clear argument’ to retain it, but a ‘very strong case for an overhaul of the procedural framework of the Human Rights Act’.
The Ministry of Justice says the measures will ‘restore Parliament’s role as the ultimate decision maker’ on laws affecting the UK.
It said the changes would allow ‘more scope’ on how to interpret rulings by the ECHR.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at email@example.com.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
The Insidexpress is now on Telegram and Google News. Join us on Telegram and Google News, and stay updated.